Strategic audit: revealing the invisible gaps between strategy and the field
Only a third of managers can name their company's top three priorities (Sull and Homkes, HBR). How a strategic audit reveals the gaps between strategy and the field, step by step.
Key takeaways
- 1In a study of nearly 11,000 managers, only a third could name their company's top three priorities (Sull and Homkes, Harvard Business Review, 2015).
- 261% of executives surveyed by the Economist Intelligence Unit admit their firms struggle to bridge strategy and day-to-day implementation.
- 3A strategic audit reveals these gaps and separates causes from symptoms.
- 4Its value lies in clear priorities and directly actionable recommendations, not in the thickness of the report.
On paper, everything is aligned: the strategy is defined, objectives are set, teams are informed. Yet the results aren't there. This mismatch isn't inevitable: it almost always signals gaps between strategic intent and organisational reality. Gaps you stop seeing once you are inside, and which research shows are far more common than people believe.
What research says about the strategy execution gap
The gap between the strategy that is decided and the strategy that is actually applied isn't a consultant's hunch. It is documented.
In 2015, Donald Sull (MIT Sloan) and Rebecca Homkes (London Business School) published in Harvard Business Review the results of a survey of around 11,000 senior executives, leaders and managers in more than 400 companies. Their findings are striking:
- only a third of managers could correctly name their company's top three priorities;
- even with five attempts, only around half could name the same single top priority;
- among those involved in developing the strategy, barely more than half managed it;
- managers said they could rely on colleagues in other departments "all of the time" in less than 10% of cases.
Two years earlier, an Economist Intelligence Unit survey for the Project Management Institute, covering 587 executives, reached a similar conclusion: 61% admitted their firms struggled to bridge the gap between strategy formulation and day-to-day implementation.
In other words: in most organisations the strategy exists, but it doesn't travel the way people think.
Why gaps become invisible
An organisation gets used to its own ways of working. Workarounds become habits, pain points become "normal", and weak signals get lost in day-to-day work. It isn't a lack of clarity: it is the natural consequence of being involved in the action every day.
Three mechanisms keep this blind spot in place:
- the position effect: leadership sees consolidated results, teams see concrete difficulties, and few people see both;
- the filter effect: information gets smoothed at every level as it travels up;
- the habit effect: what has been dysfunctional for a long time stops being seen as a problem.
The result: leadership sees the results, teams see the difficulties, but nobody sees the link between the two.
Where the most common gaps hide
A strategic audit examines several dimensions together, because it is often where they meet that performance is lost:
| Dimension | Key question | Common warning sign |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy and positioning | Is the intent clear, shared and reflected in the offer? | Everyone describes the strategy differently |
| Organisation and decisions | Do roles and processes serve the strategy? | Decisions questioned or worked around |
| Management and teams | Do teams have guidance, resources and engagement? | Conflicting priorities between departments |
| Sales practices | Where is sales performance lost? | Large gaps between salespeople |
| Customer experience | Does the journey keep the promise of the sale? | Recurring complaints on the same points |
How a strategic audit works
At Vision Human Consulting, the audit follows the ODC method: Observe, Decode, Consolidate.
Observe
Interviews with leadership, middle management and frontline teams, observation of practices, analysis of existing documents and indicators. The aim is to see the situation as it is lived, not as it is described.
Choosing who to interview is essential. Sull and Homkes's work shows that understanding of priorities declines the further you get from leadership. Interviewing only the executive committee would mean seeing only the strategy as it is designed.
Decode
Findings are connected with one another. This is the key step: it separates causes from symptoms and identifies the truly critical gaps, those whose resolution will have the greatest effect.
A typical example: a drop in sales conversion may come from an outdated pitch, but also from slow handling of enquiries, a priority conflict between two departments, or a poorly framed target. Treating the wrong level produces no result.
Consolidate
The debrief presents a structured reading of the situation, prioritised issues and directly actionable recommendations, with tracking indicators. It is shared with leadership, and can be shared with the teams concerned.
What a good audit is not
An audit is not a thick report that ends up in a drawer. Nor is it a judgement on people. Its value comes down to one simple question: at the end, do we know what to act on first, and why?
A good audit doesn't list everything that's wrong. It says what matters most, and where to start.
When to consider an audit
- results fall short of objectives, with no obvious cause;
- leadership decisions don't show up in the field;
- you are preparing a reorganisation, a growth phase or a handover and want an outside view;
- internal or customer pain points are multiplying;
- teams describe the strategy in very different ways.
If any of these sound familiar, the Vision · Strategic audit offer is designed for exactly that.
Sources
- Donald Sull, Rebecca Homkes, Charles Sull, "Why Strategy Execution Unravels, and What to Do About It", Harvard Business Review, March 2015. Summarised by London Business School, "Two thirds of senior managers can't name their firm's top priorities", December 2015.
- Economist Intelligence Unit for the Project Management Institute, Why Good Strategies Fail: Lessons for the C-Suite, 2013.
Key takeaways
- 1
In a study of nearly 11,000 managers, only a third could name their company's top three priorities (Sull and Homkes, Harvard Business Review, 2015).
- 2
61% of executives surveyed by the Economist Intelligence Unit admit their firms struggle to bridge strategy and day-to-day implementation.
- 3
A strategic audit reveals these gaps and separates causes from symptoms.
- 4
Its value lies in clear priorities and directly actionable recommendations, not in the thickness of the report.
Frequently asked questions
What is a strategic audit?
It is a structured analysis of the coherence between a company's strategy and its operational reality: decisions, organisation, management, sales practices and customer experience. Its goal is to identify the gaps that hold performance back and to set priorities for action.
How does a strategic audit differ from a financial audit?
A financial audit examines the accounts. A strategic audit examines the coherence between strategy, decisions, organisation, sales practices and customer experience, in other words, what produces or holds back results.
How long does a strategic audit take?
It depends on the scope: size of the organisation, number of teams involved, topics to cover. It is agreed before starting.
Who should be interviewed during the audit?
Leadership, but also middle management and frontline teams. Research shows that understanding of the strategy drops sharply further down the organisation: that is precisely where the gaps hide.
What happens after the audit?
The audit leads to prioritised recommendations. The company can implement them on its own, or with support, for example the Targeted transformation offer, a two-week engagement to turn findings into action.
Time to step back from your organisation?
A first, no-commitment conversation to understand your challenges and see whether a strategic audit is the right starting point.
Related articles
The human factor, a measurable performance lever
Engagement, alignment, clarity of roles: these topics are often sidelined. The largest international studies show they directly drive profitability, productivity and customer loyalty. And France starts from a long way back.
Read articleNew-build programme: when sales slow down, what should you check before cutting prices?
According to France's property developers' federation, 2025 was the worst year for new-build in 40 years. In this context, a discount is the most visible lever, and often the most expensive. Six areas deserve analysis first.
Read article